November 13, 2009

Sarah Palin is dumb.

By her own words, Sarah Palin is dumb. Here's the excerpt of pages 255-257 of "Going Rogue: An American Life":
By the third week in September, a “Free Sarah” campaign was under way and the press at large was growing increasingly critical of the McCain camp’s decision to keep me, my family and friends back home, and my governor’s staff all bottled up. Meanwhile, the question of which news outlet would land the first interview was a big deal, as it always is with a major party candidate.

From the beginning, Nicolle [Wallace] pushed for Katie Couric and the CBS Evening News. The campaign’s general strategy involved coming out with a network anchor, someone they felt had treated John well on the trail thus far. My suggestion was that we be consistent with that strategy and start talking to outlets like FOX and the Wall Street Journal. I really didn’t have a say in which press I was going to talk to, but for some reason Nicolle seemed compelled to get me on the Katie bandwagon.
Why didn't you have a say? There's that "really" hedging: You didn't really have a say. You're pleading passivity and impotence but you want us to think you have what it takes to be President of the United States?
“Katie really likes you,” she said to me one day. “she’s a working mom and admires you as a working mom. She has teenage daughter like you. She just relates to you,” Nicolle said. “believe me, I know her very well. I’ve worked with her.” 
It is inane to be swayed by this blather. Most of Palin's opponents would probably say the same sort of thing — or at least would have said the same thing at the time, back before any negative stories about her family had appeared. Isn't it lovely that Sarah Palin has a nice husband and kids and she has a great job too?

Women have been patted on the head like that for years. It does not express more profound respect. Indeed, it often betrays disrespect under the surface. If — back when my sons were children — someone had told me that he was impressed by my work as a law professor because I was a "working mom," I would have felt insulted. Perhaps he only meant well, but I would make a mental note to be suspicious of him. The famous Samuel Johnson quote would spring to mind: "Sir, a woman's preaching is like a dog's walking on his hind legs. It is not done well; but you are surprised to find it done at all."

If Sarah Palin did not see the limited value of Nicolle Wallace's comment about Katie Couric, then she is too pollyannaish and unsophisticated to be trusted with presidential power. Couric is a pussycat compared to the world leaders who will smile and exude pleasantries and then stab you in the back.
Nicolle had left her gig at CBS just a few months earlier to hook up with the McCain campaign. I had to trust her experience, as she had dealt with national politics more than I had.
Had to trust? Because of your limited experience? Who else would you trust? Wallace was pushing for her own former employer, CBS! Her recommendation of Couric had an element of self-interest and should have been discounted.
But something always struck me as peculiar about the way she recalled her days in the White House, when she was speaking on behalf of President George W. Bush. She didn't have much to say that was positive about her former boss or the job in general. Whenever I wanted to give a shout-out to the White House’s homeland security efforts after 9/11, we were told we couldn’t do it. I didn’t know if that was Nicolle’s call.
Why didn't you know? Why did you trust this person? Why do you now think it makes you look good to blame her for your traipse into the lioness's den?
Nicolle went on to explain that Katie really needed a career boost. “She just has such low self-esteem,” Nicolle said. She added that Katie was going through a tough time. “She just feels she can’t trust anybody.”
Katie has low self-esteem?! Bullshit! Anyone with the stuff to be President would have said bullshit. Or something like: Look, I'm running for Vice President. I can't be distracted by some TV diva's need for an emotional boost. Not unless I know it will translate into making me look great. But how would that work? Her boost is only likely to come if she makes me look terrible. Even if she has low self-esteem, #1, I don't care, it's hardly a pressing issue I need to be thinking about, and #2, that makes her more dangerous to me. She can't trust anybody? Well, I don't trust her. And Nicolle, how can you even present me with such an argument that is so specious on its face?
I was thinking, And this has to do with John McCain’s campaign how?
Nicolle said. “She wants you to like her.”
She wants me to like her or she wants America — especially the media elite — to like her? Come on, Nicolle, Katie Couric can't be that much of a sad sack. And if she is, I don't want to be seen with her.
Hearing all that, I almost started to feel sorry for her. Katie had tried to make a bold move from lively morning gal to serious anchor, but the new assignment wasn’t going very well.
You know who I feel sorry for? Kim Jong Il. I'm afraid he's lonely.
“You know what? We’ll schedule a segment with her,” Nicolle said. “If it doesn’t go well, if there’s no chemistry, we won’t do any others.”
Chemistry? What is this, a date — perhaps just a coffee, so that if you don't like her it will be over soon, and you won't need to see her again?
Meanwhile, the media blackout continued. It got so bad that a couple of times I had a friend in Anchorage track down phone numbers for me, and then I snuck in calls to folks like Rush Limbaugh, Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity and someone I thought was Larry Kudlow but turned out to be Neil Cavuto’s producer.
She had trouble getting phone numbers? She "snuck" around, relying on friends? Like it's a Nancy Drew caper. And did she not see the downside of allowing right-winger to draw her out? That wasn't fair to McCain. McCain's people locked her down? Did she think carefully about their reasons? Does she think carefully about anything? Why did she agree to be McCain's running mate? She won't take responsibility for her own difficulties.

Apparently, they were afraid you were not ready, and they were right, so why didn't you trust them or at least accept that you owed them control over the presidential campaign? You agreed to take the subordinate position, and you had to know that their reasons for picking you had to do with image and style. If you weren't prepared to do it their way, you should not have accepted the part. At the very least, you should not have been mystified about the way they were treating you. You should have been looking at the campaign strategy from every angle and building your sophistication, not just aching to burst free and expose yourself to the world — which, as you soon learned, did not go well.

It seems that Sarah Palin wasn't able or didn't want to bother to analyze whether she was ready to debut on the big media stage, and she wasn't large-minded enough to think beyond herself to what it would mean for the whole campaign. That is, she was dumb. She was too dumb to handle campaign responsibilities properly, so she was clearly too dumb to step into the role of President of the United States.

Could she build up her political intelligence? Might she have it now or by 2012? If these 2 pages of  "Going Rogue" are any evidence, she is displaying her weaknesses all over again, and she is still too dumb to be President. And, most scarily, she doesn't know how dumb she still is.

453 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   401 – 453 of 453
blake said...

400!

wv: fathu

(fathu, too, buddy!)

John said...

"John, think back to the late 90s. We repealed legislation (Glass Steagall) that regulated banks. Was our banking system better then or now?"

Glass Stegal wasn't the problem. The problem was FANNIE Mae and Freddie Mac that created the subprime mortgage industry. They subsidized it and gaurenteed it with our money. Then Greenspan added in easy money and the bubble was on. This entire mess is the fault of the government and assholes like Chris Dodd and Barney Frank got rich off of it and should be in jail. Instead, they are now going to fix the problem.

Beth said...

I haven't read all 400-some comments. Has anyone weighed in to say Ann just hates Palin 'cause Sarah's so pretty?

maninthemiddle said...

I like Palin - certainly have not determined if she is presidential at this point.
However - I find it amusing that we take seriously her enemies caricatures and those who thought Obama was so wonderful - good track record that.
At this point, I take interest in observing anyone that the left is attempting to eviscerate before the fact.

bobsmith said...

Unfortunately, I find guys like blake less than interesting.

The cigarette tax? Really? It's overwhelmingly popular with the public (only 20% of whom smoke anymore) and it got real bipartisan support.

What INCOME taxes has Obama raised? But yeah, he probably would under better circumstances. After all, we have a 15 billion dollar federal debt. As well as a budget with military and entitlement spending off limits for major cuts.

And yeah, I believe that not believing statistics is dumb.

miller said...

bobsmith is moving the goalposts. Now that he's shown to be wrong about taxes, he changes his mind to mean "Oh, INCOME taxes."

Which will rise when Bush's tax cuts expire under the Man-child President, which means he (MC President) will preside over in yet another INCREASE in taxes.

Not to mention MC President's hope for a mandatory tax to fund government-controlled health care.

Unknown said...

I don't understand why you point to these passages to make the case that Palin is dumb, when we already have hours of video evidence proving the case conclusively.

reader_iam said...

Beth: Why, yes, yes!--indeed, some people have. ; )

I find your un-shocked! un-shocked! implication deeply reassuring, indeed.

miller said...

But I love watching MC President self-destruct.

It's like watching Judy and Mickey putting on a show.

Republican said...

How is Palin going to portray herself as "going rogue"?

She didn't do it in this sample.

The book has hit the shelves. According to a Freek, she bought it at the grocery store tonight.

Beth said...

thanks, reader! you saved me some reading.

JohnDoeAt30Below said...

Sarah Palin is so dumb that she single-handedly killed health care reform from a FaceBook account.

blake said...

Watch closely folks, never once does his fingers leave his hands!

bobsmith before: John, what taxes has Obama raised?

bobsmith after: The cigarette tax? Really? It's overwhelmingly popular with the public (only 20% of whom smoke anymore) and it got real bipartisan support.

Just like Obama! Not one dime! Well, okay, lots of dimes! But wait:

What INCOME taxes has Obama raised?

So, as long as it's not an income tax, the government can extract whatever monies out of you they want, and it's okay because it's not income tax.

But at least he's honest enough to admit:

But yeah, he probably would under better circumstances.

He will any way. However they hide it. Failing to fix AMT, letting the Bush tax cuts expire, or whatever.

After all, we have a 15 billion dollar federal debt. As well as a budget with military and entitlement spending off limits for major cuts.

Trillion. I don't get "off limits". if they're off limits, we're f*cked, whatever happens.

And yeah, I believe that not believing statistics is dumb.

Treating all statistics as equally valid is dumb.

miller said...

Sometimes I long for a smarter class of trolls who can argue data and not engage in ad hominem.

Like others point out, Palin's leapfrogged the old technology & has wielded the new, disruptive technology.

With 60 Senators and 250+ Representatives the Democrats can't pass health care or Cap & Tax.

Who's more powerful and smart, she who uses a simple weapon to stop opponents with a flick of the wrist, or the ones who are reduced to sputtering rage that this no-account yahoo from Wasilla just won't go away and let them run the world?

Some of you though Saracuda was an epithet rather than an apt description.

Your loss.

KaJo said...

The *answer* was pretty clearly, "He's not coming but I wish that he would and that he'd be involved in the life of his beautiful son."

Palin didn't duck the question. She just failed to answer the way that Oprah wanted her to.


I wonder -- since none of us have seen the ENTIRE Palin-Oprah interview -- if Palin mentioned that the reason Levi Johnston wouldn't be attending a Palin Thanksgiving feast is because the Palins will be on that book tour, and they could only offer him some hotel buffet or a restaurant "special".

I imagine Levi would rather take his sister to visit their incarcerated mother on Thanksgiving Day...

(which is another topic rife with speculation -- rumor has it Palin was pushing the prosecutor to throw the book at Levi's mother, and he did, but after Palin resigned, the most severe charges were thrown out)

C.S. said...

To explain, Professor Althouse

You ask, why didn't Sarah Palin "have a say" in her media strategy? The answer is simple and obvious: It wasn't her campaign and it wasn't her staff.

Unknown said...

Hi Ann,

Would you like an onion ring?

vbspurs said...

The book has hit the shelves. According to a Freek, she bought it at the grocery store tonight.

I find that hard to believe. It's official launch is November 17. There are no advance copies for public consumption. I know, I tried all my connections in the biz.

BTW, Amazon has it for 9 buckeroonies. NINE instead of $29, with free-two day shipping. Incredible.

Cheers,
Victoria

vbspurs said...

My proposed reading of Going Rogue on the Kindle has a setback:

Kindle Edition, December 26, 2009 $9.00

So I'll have to buy a dead tree version on Tuesday, just like the rest.

Cheers,
Victoria

vbspurs said...

Oops, no. It's free-two day shipping only if you sign up for Amazon Prime. Free shipping with an order of over 25 bucks though.

narciso said...

She was being charitable, you Trig Truther twit, what is she supposed to say, I'm aiming a shot gun at the front door, if he does show up.
I don't get how this is any of her responsibility, he of the
godforsaken Johnston clan, was dating the daughter of the Governor
of the State. He was only really brought out after Sullivan's delusional cry for help, forced the point. She's a Feminist for Life, so birth control can't be considered an outre step. But it becomes more important to watch
this lout, encouraged by the Sharpton and Mattox of the state, make a fool of himself

miller said...

I think Wal-Mart online has the cheapest price, followed by B&N and Amazon.

I haven't seen the interview w/ Oprah, but I suspect Palin is simply being charitable about the father of her grandchild. She has learned in politics and in family life not to burn bridges.

Still, fascinating to me to see how the left gets completely unhinged by Palin, shouting "we are not interested in her!" all the while pouring out torrents of abuse.

I still think Palin bears scrutiny. We should know all about her before she runs again (if she does).

But this is pretty smart: here's a woman who holds no government office, just a private citizen, and yet she's wielding Facebook to halt a government takeover of an American industry.

By comparison, MC President and his teleprompter don't seem to be able to close the deal.

Unknown said...

I have to say that whoever selected that Palin be the Secretary of Energy is the winner of the biggest laugh of the day. I assume you are a troll, otherwise you may be actually as delusional as Palin herself.

Big Mike said...

@Beth, if you're still reading.

We are getting hit hard by a Nor'easter that had its source in Ida. Three days of rain and more due today (Saturday).

In the future kindly keep your hurricanes to yourself. Thank you.

former law student said...

[Obama] never said jack shit.

Obama was a veteran of 27 debates before he got the nomination, then three more against McCain. You learn to prepare for any questions over that length of time.

Palin had one debate -- that's it.

Beth said...

Big Mike,

I promise I didn't stick pins in a Big Mike voodoo doll and hope for Ida to head your way.

Well, I did hope Ida would head someone else's way. That's the awful dilemma of watching that Gulf weather map and hoping the damn thing will turn.

Beth said...

Still, fascinating to me to see how the left gets completely unhinged by Palin, shouting "we are not interested in her!" all the while pouring out torrents of abuse.

Posted as one of 426 at this point on this thread - torrents of something, by someone. Who's unhinged again?

miller said...

Beth, I think the reference is to the blogosphere going crazy about Palin, not just Althouse.

I could be wrong.

miller said...

Why does the media report on Palin’s every word and then collectively question her relevance?

From Patterico, known to be a slavish right-wing tool.

gnostic19 said...

Sadly, the majority of the comments here show that most of your readership shares the same intellectual traits that you've concluded Mrs. Plain possesses.

Conservatism is something i long to appreciate and learn about, but today's representation of it tells me that there has to be more to it that what is shown today.

Unknown said...

She's an idiot and practically lost McCain the election if he even had any chance to begin with.

She plays to the most ignorant and out of touch of the right and they believe every word she says.

Half the time she doesn't even make sense. She quit her governors position, but she's not a quitter...? Uh what? "I can see Russia from my house." = Foreign policy experience? I guess i could claim foreign policy experience too since I've traveled to Canada once when I was a child.

Ridiculous how she's even still talked about. She's irrelevant and will never ever (thank god) have a chance at VP or even president. I would be surprised if she could even get any cabinet position.

miller said...

Matt,

Do you get ALL your knowledge about politics and current events from SNL?

You've been pwned.

Big Mike said...

@Beth, I read somewhere that you have to have a lock of my hair to make the voodoo doll work, and since I've lost most of mine you're sort of out of luck.

You are no doubt well aware that my politics place me just a bit to your right (more humor there), but count me among those who think that Sarah Palin is too green to be President anytime soon. I think Professor Althouse has overanalyzed Mrs. Palin based on a short excerpt from her book, but Althouse is right that the passage suggests Palin's political instincts were not fully developed (and probably not fully developed as of Thanksgiving 2009).

All that said, I think much -- probably most -- of the left's visceral detestation of Sarah Palin hinges on refusal to conform to what women are supposed to believe, per their view of block voting. You have come across to me as thinking for yourself, and thinking outside of the box. I expect you've seen the same response, though at a much reduced level commensurate with the difference between an ordinary citizen and a woman elevated to national politics.

IMAO the situation is much worse for black men who choose conservativism -- ask the Steele twins (Claude and Shelby), or Michael (no relation), or Thomas Sowell or Clarence Thomas.

As I said before, though, I like Sarah Palin. She comes across as a real person, in marked contrast to obvious phonies like Biden, Obama, and, yes, McCain.

Oh and I certainly do think that at least some of the response of leftist females to Sarah Palin is due to her attractiveness and the fact that she has married a handsome, championship-caliber athlete athlete who is content to let his wife have the spotlight and who helps out with the kids and around the house. Married as she is to Meade I don't think that it plays much of role in Althouse's assessment of Sarah Palin the female politician, but the hatred positively drips from the pens of Ruth Marcus and Dahlia Lithwick, and others of that ilk.

wv: bonic -- how a Southern pronounces "bionic."

Beth said...

Mike,

We are in different camps, indeed.

I agree there's some idiotic tendencies in criticisms of conservative women and black men. No problem stipulating that.

But it's not hard to simply oppose Palin for her actual politics. The other stuff's just icing on the cake. It's not like liberals would vote for her if she weren't a woman, or if she weren't "pretty" -

Speaking of which, honestly, do you really have some idea that feminists are bitter and ugly and just can't get a good-looking man? So they hate that pretty girl who did? I can't even figure out how to respond to that. That's one of those "is too!" "is not!" arguments. Useless.

But there you go. We have different perceptions. I find that whole winking persona of hers incredibly fake. She's a politician. They are not, as a breed, sincere and "real" people.

Layer Seven said...

There is no more raging hormonal imbalance among regressive ignorami than the urge to attack Sarah Palin.

Attack Al Gore.

Rick Caird said...

What a strange rant from Ann. Ann did vote for Obama and we know she is less than thrilled with the job he has done. This anti Palin rant seems so overdone that it almost seems as if Ann is trying to convince herself she did make the correct choice.

No, Ann, you didn't. No matter what you think of Sarah Palin, it is pretty hard to conceive of her on a worldwide apology tour accompanies by bows.

Now, if you are going to complain about Palin and how the McCain campaign used her, you at least ought to compare it with Biden and how he became not only a laughing stock, but was hidden away to campaign in such places as Podunk, WV where they hoped he would get no press coverage.

Rick

Big Mike said...

@Beth, I don't like the winking either.

Do I really, honestly, have the idea that feminsts as a group are bitter and ugly? Nope. I think women come in lots of varieties. Thankfully! I think I said "at least some" in my post, which qualifies my answer. But I think I am picking up on jealousy as an undercurrent in some of the commentary.

I regard my wife as a feminist -- she worked on a Ph.D. in nuclear science in the early 70's, back when professors had no qualms about denying a female grad student time on the cyclotron because once she got her degree she'd just be taking a job away from a man who'd have to support his family. It still makes me ball up my fists. Young punk kids like you, who came along only a few years after, faced much, much less of that crap.

What do you think defines a feminist? Is it her willingness to take on the challenge of non-traditional roles and face us men as equals? Or does feminism require you to sulk and go whine about menfolk unless you get special treatment? Can you simper and fuss like a character in a third-rate Regency Romance as long as you are pro-abortion? Is abortion the defining characteristic of feminism?

Anonymous said...

Ms. Althouse,

I think you can't understand the compassionate heart of Sarah Palin, thus all you can do is call her "dumb." I think you sum up your view in this quote:

'Even if she has low self-esteem, #1, I don't care,' ... no need to say any more, honestly. Based on your analysis of Sarah Palin, the difference between her and you is that you don't care, thus you interpret her compassionate approach to other people as stupid.

It's the pettiness of self-hate speaking, and the jealousy of a woman who can't quite muster the grace, the selflessness, and - thus - the beauty (internal, that is, don't get snippy) - of Sarah Palin. For your sake, I will pray that you drop your hatred and accept that you might have something to learn from Sarah Palin: i.e., how to maintain grace and dignity under impossible pressure, more importantly - how to see the world from a Godly perspective, wherein your first thought is the heart and feelings of the person next to you.

Good luck!

Beth said...

Big Mike,

That last paragraph should be in verse - very fun.

I don't think abortion rights are the litmus test for feminism, no. There are too many differences among people who label themselves feminists to ask for a single definition - and feminism is not, alone, what would keep me from voting for Palin. I'm a liberal, she's a conservative. We can start there. Liberal feminists and conservative feminists share some concerns and part on others. I have and will again vote for some conservative feminists - most likely on the local level.

Big Mike said...

@Beth, I can't ask for more than an open mind, which you have amply demonstrated that you possess.

kazoolist said...

This post doesn't deserve to be on your otherwise excellent blog.

If anything, the arguments you are making should lead to a post titled "Nicole Wallace is dumb."

It's really unfortunate to see that the you've joined the "Palin is stupid" bandwagon. It's a lie, and I thought you'd have been smart enough to see through it.

Unknown said...

@miller

I haven't watched SNL in at least 6 years. That show is way past its prime. How is that even relevant to this to begin with?

Your saying that because Palin acts like an idiot on national television, then SNL parody's it, that I somehow got my information from SNL and not.... IDK maybe her interviews?

No one made palin look stupid except herself. Go watch her interviews and its pretty clear she doesn't know much about the world at all.

Beth said...

Thanks, Mike. I always enjoy talking with you.

miller said...

Matt

You appear to be easily offended & yet poorly researched.

Please google the use of "I can see Russia from my house" to see when Palin said it. You might be shocked to discover that while you have a certain opinion of Palin, it is not based upon facts.

Cheers,

former law student said...

It's not like liberals would vote for her if she weren't a woman, or if she weren't "pretty" -

Excellent point. Liberals would not vote for Palin's closest male equivalent, Mike Huckabee.

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

@miller

No one said that she said it. What she said was that Alaska being neighbors with Russia somehow equals foreign policy experience. There's a fact for you.

david said...

Palin isn't dumb. She's just willfully ignorant.

miller said...

While it's interesting to see leftists unable to write coherently, let me point out that "I don't like Sarah Palin" is NOT best expressed by "Palin is dumb."

Because this so-called "dumb" woman has stopped the President of the United States of America from his agenda, simply by posting a few times on Facebook.

"Dumb" or not, she certainly read him well and figured out how to stop him, he who is allegedly the most powerful person in the world.

With just a few lines of text.

"Dumb"? or smart like a fox?

You can decide based on your emotions, but calling her "dumb" is not based upon facts.

Unknown said...

Palin was naive, but her problem was not in beliving that foreign leaders were trustworthy, her problem was in beliving that someone handpicked by McCain ON HER OWN SIDE was not trustworthy.

Think of it having the same personal significance as the Bay of Pigs had for Kennedy.

Would you rather have someone learn this lesson with the CIA and Global Nuclear War? Or with a political staffer and Katie Couric?

Unknown said...

Good God, Ann, but you're a stupid jackass.

Sissy Willis said...

Brilliant -- and terrifying! -- cross-examination, counselor.

But I'm inclined to agree with Joe Lieberman, who reportedly gave Palin the following advice when McCain aides were overprepping her:

"I think I know you well enough already, Gov Palin, to know you need to be free…to speak from the heart.” He “told her to trust herself and have fun.”

Quote source: CSM “Sarah Palin on Oprah Winfrey Show: Five best outtakes” http://bit.ly/2PFKEH

Austin Realtor said...

Gotta love it. Good post Alt.. Only a die hard right wing conservative against sex ed could have a daughter knocked up by a hillbilly and still run on the platform. She's a Maverick, and runs with the other mavericks. Maverick! wahoo.

«Oldest ‹Older   401 – 453 of 453   Newer› Newest»