May 4, 2011

What Alfred Hitchcock tells us about whether Obama should show us the bullet-ridden head of Osama bin Laden.

Here's the fantastic "I think you're evil!" clip from Hitchcock's "The Birds":


I Think You're Evil! by movieclips

I looked that up because Titus invoked it in the thread about whether the bin Laden death photos should be shown: "I want to see them and he better look like Suzanne Pleshette in The Byrds." Titus is a comic commenter who says all manner of outrageous things (and misspells to amuse us). (By the way, did you know that the rock group The Byrds came out around the same time as the Hitchcock movie, and they adapted the movie slogan: "The Byrds is coming"?)

Anyway, if you've seen "The Birds," you have the feeling that you stared straight at a stark depiction of the character Annie (Suzanne Pleshette) with her eyes completely plucked out. With the clip at your control, you may have to go back a few times before you can be sure how much you really saw. I mean, I think I went back about 10 times, and I'm still not sure! But you see almost nothing. Similarly, in "Psycho," you feel you see the knife cut into Janet Leigh multiple times, but, in fact, you never see that.

The vivid, lingering image of the eyeless Pleshette is a product of imagination, and in our imagination we already have the picture of Osama's blasted face. Why should we prefer the opportunity to stare at the destruction? If "The Birds" were made today, we probably would get a long look at gruesome special effects, and it would, undoubtedly be a much worse movie with far less emotional impact. We might even laugh at it. How would we react to the real photo of bin Laden? I don't know. Maybe we'd feel a thrill, followed perhaps by shame at our brutishness. More likely, we'd stare to the point of familiarity and arrive at some clinical distance.

Why would Obama want that? Like a remake of "The Birds," it's beyond unnecessary.

203 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 203 of 203
The Crack Emcee said...

Titus,

I would love to see you replace Frank Rich on Sunday NY Times.

I was glad to see her give you props, too (I like your comments) but yours was a back-handed compliment if ever I've read one.

I'm not necessarily saying you're wrong, but,...

Darrell said...

And you are an asshole. Could Stanley Ann confer citizenshp, given her age? Why don't you look up the law in place at the time? If
the question is moot, why did the Obama campaign start pushing the " single mother" meme late in the game? Would that be to remove British citizenship from play?

What part don't you understand? Obama put a computer-assembled document on the web that would never be accepted by any court or official government agency. Since he did, I challenge the State Of Hawaii to send an official copy with the State Seal and all the required signatures to the US Supreme Court. What's the problem? Wouldn't it be exactly what Obama released? If that is the official document there should be no problem, right?

Did Obama release this piece of shit so that the States with legislation pending to require legal proof of US citizenship would drop those Bills? Could a single State hold up election certification if Obama couldn't produce legal proof?

Anonymous said...

Darrell -- I was a consular officer. I know the law very well. Thanks for playing, though.

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 203 of 203   Newer› Newest»